PR Review: Add comprehensive unit tests for Blade directives

Thank you for this comprehensive test suite for the Blade directives! This PR addresses issue #31 and provides solid coverage for the @aauth and @endaauth directives.

✅ Strengths

1. Comprehensive Coverage: The test suite covers all major use cases including directive compilation, permission checking, support for quotes/variables, nested directives, and HTML content rendering.

2. Good Test Structure: Tests follow a clear pattern and use Pest's expressive syntax effectively.

3. Real-World Scenarios: Testing with actual HTML content and multiple blocks reflects real usage patterns.

🔍 Critical Issue: Security Vulnerability with eval()

Severity: High - Lines 38-41, 51-54, 113-115, 134-137

The tests use eval() to execute compiled Blade templates. This is a significant security risk and is generally discouraged in PHP.

Recommendation: Use Laravel's built-in Blade::render() method instead of compiling and using eval(). This is safer, cleaner, and more maintainable.

🔍 Issue: Database Overhead

Severity: Medium

Every test runs migrate:fresh and seeds the database in beforeEach (executed 10 times). Compilation tests don't need database setup at all, making tests unnecessarily slow.

Recommendation: Split into compilation tests (no DB) and rendering tests (with DB), or use database transactions instead of migrate:fresh.

🔍 Issue: Hardcoded User/Role IDs

Severity: Low - Lines 13-18

Tests hardcode User::find(1) and role ID 3, making them fragile if the seeder changes.

Recommendation: Use named lookups like Role::whereName('Organization Role 1')->first() to match patterns in RolePermissionServiceTest.php.

📊 Test Coverage

Current: Good foundation covering compilation, rendering, quotes, variables, nesting, and HTML content.

Missing: Error handling, edge cases (empty strings, whitespace), and XSS testing.

Overall Assessment

This is a solid test suite with good coverage. Main concerns are the eval() security risk and performance overhead. Once addressed, this will be an excellent addition.

Recommendation: Request changes to address eval() usage and database overhead before merging.